Introduction: What sessionmodel2 is and When You Would Use It
Sessionmodel2 is, in short, a plugin to coordinate within-session and across-session training automation, and upgrade from the previous SessionModel plugin.
First, a word about where sessionmodel2 fits in the Solo system.The sessionmodel2 module is at uppermost layer - the 'Plugins' layer - of the Solo training software system; you could successfully use the Solo system to write and run protocols without ever using this module.
When, then, would you use this module?
Suppose you have written a behavioral protocol using the Solo system. You have painstakingly determined the training steps required to teach naïve animals the task of interest. This probably involves a sequence of training stages at each level of which, you would monitor the animals’ performance and decide whether to move to the next training step. Individual animals learn at different rates so you would adapt the progression of training steps to each animal’s performance. All of this would be done manually with the trainer observing each animal’s performance and accordingly adjusting the training parameters (SoloParamHandles).
Sessionmodel2 formalizes this sequence of training stages into a framework which can be programmed and so allows the progression of training to occur automatically (ie without manual intervention).
It allows the user to:
- Create a sequence of separate training stages
- Define what happens within any given training stage
- Determine performance criteria for changing parameter values (e.g. if animal does “badly”, make task “easier”)
- Determine performance criteria for moving to the next stage (e.g. animal “has learnt” where reward is received; now start pairing CS with reward, or alternating between blocks of trials with different task contingencies)
- Execute special instructions at the end of each session to set up the automation for the next day’s session
Automating a session has practical as well as scientific advantages: many more animals can be simultaneously trained, new protocols could be tested, the trainer is free to do other experiments, and it removes subjective intervention (which could differ between animals) on the part of the trainer.
This section must end with a caveat: Eventually, the trainer is not going to be monitoring an automated session as it happens. Unless the proper analysis tools are in place, she will not know whether the training is progressing as intended or whether a parameter has (unintentionally) been changed to an undesirable value. Such things can go unnoticed for days. See the section “Good Charioteer: Tips for Smoother Daily Automation” for some ideas on how to monitor complex protocols for several animals day after day without risking your sanity.